Obama Online – Was it really that easy?

Joe Rospars from Blue State Digital presented a quick overview in the Camden Court Hotel on Wednesday 25th on how online media helped win the US presidential election.  The alert for the bloggers orientated session was hastily sent out and got good traction on Twitter and the blogosphere which meant approximately 200 people attended, something that would have been difficult to do in the past with such short notice.  It was clear from the Drivetime interview before the session, that he was in town to promote his work for the revamped Fianna Fail online assualt, something that upset some bloggers (it was not clear before then).

Overall the session was a little light (it was free after all) and you left with a feeling that it could not have been that easy.  However there were some good points made.

Email

As we rush to bright shiny new onine tools we sometime forget about the power of email and capturing email address of those who would like to hear updates etc.  In the Obama campaign ‘value added content’, giving email recipients a first look and ensuring that the mails were personal, timely and worth reading was key.  Some were planned updates on the campaign and some were in response to the McCain efforts.

Video

The campaign produced in excess of 2,000 videos and they acted as the ‘glue’ to bring a lot of content together.  ‘Transparency’ was a key theme here and the video showed a lot of the behind the scenes operations and was combined with ‘Authenticity’ where many featured interviews and interactions with supporters.  These pillars meant that the videos were not all Obama speaking to the masses and generated lots of local/regional type content.  They generated a strong sense of people working together in a common cause.

Blog

Held together with the ‘Voices for change’ the blogs used a lot of volunteer effort spreading the message with multiple voices.  People in 28 different states were utilised and field organisers were training to the use the online tools.

Listserv

This enabled people to work from home and provided them with the tools to set up their own groups.  Over 1,000 list serv groups were established giving a very grass root feel.

Conversation and Engagement

The tools – email in particular – were the basis for stimulating conversation.

Interestingly Joe Rospars pointed out that the McCain camp has similar tools and the essential difference in success were attributed to:

- online not viewed as central part of the McCain campaign 

- no real value was placed on community/volunteerism and leveraging the supporter base

- conservative approach to engaging people at meaningful level

One final point that was made that poses interesting challenges for the PR community was the level of control.  Early on it was agreed that the usual approval and screening process would have made it impossible to get the level of content through and indeed would possibly sanitise the message too much to the point that would not appear authentic.  Joe Rospur had final say on material and huge trust would appear to have been placed on the people twittering and blogging.  There are lots of inherent risks here but this delegated responsibility with a trusted team was balanced against the need to have rapid and updated content.  I imagine there were tighter controls that indicated at the session but message was clear that in the world of new media new ways of ensuring content is on message and delivered quickly need to be devised.   

Obama himself would appear to have been reasonably distant from the technology.

In summary using the social media online tools was the minor element while how they were used, authenticity/transparency of the messages and how large groups of people were mobilised and empowered using these tools were the key success factors.

I have since received a Finna Fail email message from Brian Cowen that seems to try capture some of these elements.  Time will tell if its enough…. 

 

Other posts on the topic include:

Bitsniff

Interactive Return

Green Ink

Northern Notes

Cian in Irish Election

Karlin Lillington

and many others!

UK Digital Brands Coming to Ireland

Net imperative ran an interesting event this week in Guinness Storehouse.  It was a pretty full house, wide range of understanding amongst the attendees, had a good line up and strangely enough was free.  Perhaps Piaras was right about the future being free.  As most of the speakers were sponsors it is probably safe to assume that they will be offering or looking to expand their services in Ireland.  Normally these type events are direct sales pitches but the balance was pretty good at this one.

Some interesting insights:

Christopher Bennett, Blyk gave some great insights into the youth market being knowledge driven, collaborative, socially fragmented, multichannelling and microconsuming.  These digital natives want innovation and are digitally aware, confident and looking for value.  In building his story toward the Blyk offering he outlined some of the mobile stats with

  • 3.3 billion mobile hand sets globally
  • Twice the number of TVs
  • Three times the number of PCs
  • and over 78,000 sold during the time of his presentation

Mobile phone usage was also a bit different than you would expect with the most popuar use of phones of the 16-24 age group reporting

  1. Calls
  2. Text messaging (no surprises here)
  3. Alarm clock (not me with blipping mails)
  4. Finally use of it as torch

Blyk provide sim cards and free calls in return for customers agreeing to receive up to 6 messages a day.  The service is invite only (similar to gmail early days) and they only target the 16-24 audience as its a traditionally hard group to reach (an hence very attractive to advertisers).  The real beauty of their service is that they get very detailed information about the users which means they can generate highly relevant ads.  This covers demographic detail, interest etc but also the handset details (so they can customise photos/videos etc).  So much so that the average response rate is 25% with 75% achieved for highly targeted campaigns.  Their firm belief is that with such a focus on the interest areas that advertising is percieved as a valuable service and not intrusive.  This blended in with his discussion on the power of marketing to one.

Chris did not outline plans for Ireland but his description of market places they are interested in has an uncanny resemblance to Ireland.  I imagine there will be lots of recession hit student ready to sell their personal details for free calls.

Adam Parker from RealWire discussed the changes that are taking place in the PR/media market place with a move from the paper based media to publishers such as Total Telecom, Hoovers to the growth of blogs (micro blogs, social media) and now UGC (User Generated Content).  His main points being that the new media is instant, far reaching and enduring and hence can be more powerful that traditional print media. 

So why would PR companies use his service or rather go online – the usual reasons

  • Ability to influence search rankings
  • Online conversations taking place anyway
  • Controlled brand message syndication

He pointed to some online review sites, that no one in audience had heard of, with high Alexa rankings as a examples of opportunities that are being missed with a focus on traditional media. 

On a positive note he reported that up to 70% of UK PR companies either do not report having a online PR service or blog or both.  This would correspond to Damien Mulleys blog on same in the Irish market.

Adman finished on a final note that in addition to the expected online virtues people online are active and looking for something while off line they are passive. 

Claira Jackson from Sony Music entertainment gave some good examples of how the music industry has changed as digital has grown.  Companies like Sony now offer much more value add for brand wishing to engage in music as control over the charts and music distribution has slipped away.  Collaborations with Intel and jamiroquai (access to JK, competitions), Xbox (Xbox live and video releases), Last Minute (access to celebrities and travel habits with 10 minute mini videos), Coke and iTunes.  Their insight team also carried out research and were able to give detailed pen pictures of AC DC fan.  They may not control the distribution as once before but certainly control access to musicans and official use of music by brands.  This supports the arguement by Andrew Keen that the actual music sales are the minority of the financial earnings for artists.

This presentation and the insights from Chris Bennett were of particular interest for Johnny Beirne from Download Music.ie who is offering a text based music download payment and fulfilment service.  Interesting company to watch and offer lots of opportunities for the PR industry who wish to leverage the independent artists in Ireland.

It will be interesting to see the follow up from the session.  I have already notices additional people following me on twitter from the event and some more LinkedIn follow on invites from the presenters.

What you were doing yesterday might damage what you are doing today

Trevor Holmes kindly pointed out to me that my ‘What I’m doing’ message on Linked In was out of date.  My message was that I was busy pitching, which was true at the time, but looked very odd when I had not changed for over a week.  It got me thinking that I have a number of these from IM, to Facebook to LinkedIn and they are something that people do notice.  Normally they are very general but as rightly pointed out they are a good  opportunity to promote and keep your profile fresh or can be damaging if out dated or worse if negative.  Easy thing to pass over as your view of social media is different to other people.

Building on this I have spotted many messages on peoples SuperWall on Facebook where they obviously realise halfway through a conversation that its a public and not a private conversation. 

Time I logged in to see how my different profiles look from someone elses computer.

Some likely changes to the PR industry!

I started this post as ‘the Future of PR companies’ but it was too broad and looked like an enormous post so I have distilled to some observations.

The public relations industry is posed to change enormously and at the same time set to remain the same.  Let me explain.  Changes in social media (and all the new skills it involves), a balancing of focus away from traditional media and all the new services mean a very welcome change in what PR companies do.  Much of the adoption will come from bottom up pressure and new entrants bringing new ‘native’ and purer online skills.  However the success of PR into the future is not only dependent on mastering new platforms but rather utilising and adapting the central communications and messaging skills.  The innate gut feel of what is a good story, understanding the temperature of the moment, know what to say and when to say it  and having ones finger on the pulse takes a long time to build up.  Largely this life time skill set can be limited by constricted outlets ie just dealing with traditional media.

So how will the emergence of new media change what future PR companies look like and how they work.  Some areas where i think we will see change include:

 

1. Collaboration

Collaboration between the industry is already growing through platforms such as Plaxo and Linked In.  Rapidly formed collaborative groups formed PR groups on Facebook, Linked In, Ning show a willingness to share that I have only previously witnessed with close colleagues in the past.  As people develop specialist skills this could easily evolve into PR practitioners utilising the collective skills to work on client projects.  This will be slow to happen with larger agencies but more likely with smaller niche players.  e.g. some looking to develop a Linked In strategy could utilised Krisna De or Social Networking could utilise Conor Lynch.  From a clients perspective the experience would be project managed to appear as one.

2. Location

Physical location is already reducing in importance in PR.  City Centre offices were alway the preferred location for a variety of historical reasons.  This included being close to media outlets.  The need for this diminished with the introduction of email.  Building on the collaborative theme PR practitioners could be based anywhere in the country with good broadband connections.  As the future PR practitioner will not be fully focused on national media and could be focused on social media, for example, then location is less important.

3. Skills Sets

Apart from the central communications skills from writing, developing messages etc a deeper computer literacy will be needed.  Consider first how the media is likely to change to help illustrate this.  Most traditional media have a website, most have blogs, some have started to incorporate PodCasting and some have Video Casting.  PR should be able to deliver content in these forms which means need hardware and software skills namely audio and video recorders and the related editing software from audacity to audition to premier pro.  Yes this can be outsourced but these skills are not just going to be needed for media relations.  Most social media demand multimedia content from videos, pictures to podcast material.  Turn around is important in having these skills.  If you organise a press conference and are uploading to YouTube, blog, Facebook etc then you will need to be able to do some basic edits and get it up fast for it to be relevant.  The era of corporate video costing many thousands of euro and taking months to develop has moved to shorter, faster, less higher quality (which will probably not be noticed on web platforms) but higher number of interactions.  One size no longer fits all.

3. Blogger Relations

There are load of guides to blogger relations from how to guides to codes of practice.  PR has received bad press to date here because people treat it the same way as bad traditional media relations.  Mainly this covers the write once and send to all practice.  Not good in traditional media relations but worse in blogger relations.  So what is the impact.  PR agencies work on a time based model.  Clients buy x amount of time at set rates.  The price of this service has largely remained static as PR companies got faster at syndicating press releases due to email and better word processors.  Problem is that blogger relations takes time.  Individual pitching, understanding the individual blog focus and the blogger themselves, commenting over time, tracking through RSS feeds, researching them through the various methods Damien Mulley mentions all takes time.  To short circut this some PR companies just added blogger email addresses to their BCC lists with poor reputation results.  The end result is that as blogger and journalists reach parity in terms of influence that PR may become more expensive.

 There are many more examples of how the future PR will look from Online Reputation Management to influencing social network but will hold for another post.

Eoin

Will the Arts lead the Web 2.0 Wave?

The Arts Council ran a thought provoking conference yesterday in Dublin Castle entitled New Media New Audience.  The attendees ranged from small theatrical organisations to service providers.  It was positioned as a thought platform but the organisation went beyond that to a full scale programme with a variety of different experts.  The arts sector has great potential to exploit the benefits and opportunities of online but there was a general initial reluctance due to lack of awareness of the tools, the size and nature of online audiences and concerns about artistic integrity.

Dr. Martin Mansergh TD introduced the conference talking about the boundaries that arts organisations have always worked within and the challenges and opportunities in expanding these to the online world.  Theatrical companies have worked within the physical boundaries to date but virtual presences with video casting of performances can extend this to new audiences but care needs to be taken in maintain artistic integrity.

The conference kicked off with a lively and eloquent debate between Charles Leadbeater and Andrew Keen.  Both inevitably agreed that communication has changed and the landscape is hugely different but differed huge on the value of the change.  Charles Leadbeater argued that change is positive and that we now live in an era of Peddles and Bolders.  Bolders being the larger broadcasters such as the BBC and Peddles being the nimble online players from bloggers, online communities and social media sites such as You Tube, Facebook and Flickr.   Leadbeater opened up his section with a You Tube video by funtwo which has received over 52 million  views to date as an example of how content can be developed without the need for permission, low production values yet reach a huge audience.  He then walked through the route that one would have to go through to make it fit with a bolder like the BBC.  To him this movement best represents the Bolders/Peddles analogy.  The analogy is not static and bolders can utilise peddles and spoke about Obama being a Bolder who did peddles and reach a huge community.  Arts organisations need to develop a more user centric view and acknowledge that the role of the artist in challenging the status quo and environment.

In defining the role of new media he spoke about personal example of going to a match being only one part of the experience and blogs and other new media allow him the capability to express views and talk about the experience.   Enjoy, Talk and Do helps classify how people engage and the change to the Enjoy being higher with younger audiences.

He finished his section by talking about how his son interacts with technology and how it has changed from his own childhood experiences.  From his memories of spending Sundays evenings watching Songs of Praise he recalled how his son recently shocked him by going online one Sunday evening and creating his own animated series from scratch without help.

Andrew Keen has a contradictory view of the value that democratisation of the web has brought and indeed if the web is now more ‘square’ and less democratic.

He questioned how much money has been made by people on You Tube, has it made them any better despite the huge viewership figures and if these experiences has made the arts any richer in terms of integrity and quality of content.

He presented a view that cultural authority is being destroyed by You Tube and that self publishing on the internet is a cultural assault on authority.

He maintained that the personalisation of culture does away with standards and that “Cultural authority”  like the BBC are a good and necessary force.  He cited his own experience of self publishing where worrying about production etc meant he delivered a poor product and when he used the infrastructure of the BBC he was paid for what he did and the product was better.

There is a crisis in professional media business and that is may be noble to give away your IP for free but it is foolish not to monetising talent.

He maintains he is in favour of internet and acknowledges there is not going back but the monitising question is one of the big issues.  He also questioned the distribution power of You Tube who he maintained can only sell advising against 3% of their invertory as the rest in either stolen or inappropriate

He asked the question that if copy is free does creativity because valveless and that physical presence is all that can be exploited.  He cited that in the music industry that concerts are the main revenue generation and that this has made the artists less accessible and that the music has become more about marketing than the art itself.

He asked what happens to the shy artist in this environment where marketing becomes everything.

Eoin Purcell chaired a follow on session with a panel looking at New Media in practice where Consistency, Constraint and Quality of content were key themes.  Sheila de Courcy from RTE  shared her views about what works with younger audience citing games, video, photos, getting a behind the scenes experience and something edgy helping to keep them engaged.  Too much text was mentioned as a turn off.

She also spoke about collaborative content they had generated with younger audiences and presented a mock send up of Primetime.  One of the attendees questioned the help that was given in generating this content, a view which was shared by Nicky Gogan in the panel that professional help was needed to ensure quality and that scripts were written in collaboration and that without help content was less likely to be developed. 

The use of online tools to create art was also discussed in addition to using services such as Amazon to self publishing and monitise the content.

Using online to find peers and create links and foster relationships especially for collabaoration was also discussed.

Over all there was an appreciation of the power of Online for Promotion, despite a nervousness about the quantity of time needs, loosing IP but very little focus on the collaboration potential.

Damien Mulley presented another session on Web 2.0 and New Media where he gave insight into the interests and behaviour of digital natives and online users.  In  a recent poll almost half a class of third level student reported download programme series rather than watch on TV.  This emerging group also use online peers for recommending new shows and trends.  In discussing the speed of news dissemination he pointed to live Twitter feeds beating news services who were slow but whose reports contained more detail, if somewhat delayed.  A centric world of ‘if news or products are worth knowing then they would make their way to user through their channels’ was also explained.

On a positive side he discussed the power of creating online evangelists.

A flash back to early web experience of Yahoo and searches comprising of directory listings gave a good back drop for the positioning of Web 2-0 being about connecting people while Web 1 was connecting people to web.

Finding out where your audiences are: ie on boards.ie or Bebo was of equal importance to approaching them in the right manner and using similar styles (writing and video).

The power of building a network was supported by the Nike/Apple collaboration where real relationships have been developed with the creation of Super Fans.  Feed back on the quality and potential improvement through these networks has resulted in the development of better running shoe and building of online evangelists.  Online connections and friends can be fickle and mean a lot less than off line relationships but Damien pointed out that even weak connections can take root and that Familiar Strangers can be converted to friends over time.

A relatively low number of attendees admitted to understanding blogs and the potential of blogs to increase SEO, becoming a recognised expert, improving your message, free R&D and creating interaction were pointed out as reason to utilise this medium.  Fear of comments were countered by a note that it is better to have people discuss you on a platform you have access to and that you can change someone who complains about your product to someone who is favourable to your company.

Damien finished by discussing social media and the ability to target very exact groups on Facebook (300,000 Irish users) according to interest areas and demographic details e.g. targeting engaged women with wedding products.  He also discussed a Taxi company in Galway who have utilised their 500 friends on the Bebo network (1 million Irish users) and offer discounts for Bebo users.

LinkedIn as a professional social networking platform is one that is underutilised but new services are allowing people to leverage the 20 million audience.

 

In the research session RTE and AMAS presented some interesting figures on online audiences including that 2% of adults listened to a podcast in last month with over 67,000 downloading the Mairan Finucane interview with Nuala O’Faoilan.

Aileen O’Toole discussed the power of silver surfers and the growth of marketing budgets going on line.

Over all a lot of good sharing of content but some of the most interesting debates were off line which was one of the objectives.  One of the final sessions one ‘New Media- Old Audience’ contained some great examples of what the Royal Shakespeare Company  are doing.  Speaker Mark Ball spoke about putting plays and other catalogue items online something that there was a general reluctance to do amongst the audience.  In a Q&A session he spoke about the dual aims of their strategy of creating links with a new audience who will never visit their theatres as well as enhancing the experiences of those going to these plays, something that was echoes by Fiona Kearney, (Director of the Glucksman Gallery).

In a stark example of the difference between digital emigrants and digital natives moderator Stuart McLaughlin (Chief Executive, Business to Arts) spoke about going to plays with his 5 year old son.  Before he goes to any play he wants to see some of it online first, then following the play he wants to reenact and upload his version of the play.

Stark new realities on the way communications are rapidly changing and a general message of better to ride the wave, even if uncomfortable, than being swept under.

 

Building Applications in Facebook

Facebook offers a great medium for building relevant applications and is one of the reasons that it has maintained its current numbers of subscribers. We have built an application called Get Creative which is a database of Public Relations, Marketing and Advertising ideas. It is currently in beta testing on Facebook but the philosophy behind it is that you can search for ideas, add your own and comment on other peoples contributions to give them further life. Launched internally we have found that it helps people to start thinking more creatively and watching what trends, ideas and initiatives are happening all around them. It was born out of frustration of thinking up great ideas which disappeared into the far recesses of your mind before you could full capture them. It will be an interesting test of collaboration amongst the public relations, marketing and advertising sectors.

Get Creative Application

Some lessons from the exercise:

- Get a good developer on board
- Test as many other applications as you can to see what you like and what works well
- Keep it as simple as possible
- Keep data entry down to a minimum of time
- Be aware of the external hosting requirements
- Get a core group to test the application and populate
- If people fail or run into problems at early stages its harder to get them to engage later so make sure most bugs are eliminated early
- Think through how the application will look and how the person will interact with it and draw up a information flow
- Assume that it needs to be pretty intuitive as more people will not have the patience to read long rules and instructions
- Become an evangalist for it

We hope to roll out more broadly through Facebook in the next week or so.

Look out for the Irish Times unofficial Facebook application and the Silicon Republic one which is being tested.

Eoin

People Searching Just Got Easier

Recently there has been a number of articles about HR people using Google and the Search Engines for screening of candidates and the more worring threat of identity thieft.  Paul Taylor in the FT wrote a interesting article today that discussed two new people search services Wink and Spock.  I have tried out a few of these services before and found them fairly clunky, unfocused and expensive if you moved beyond the full service.  These two are much more accurate and produce results directly from Linked In, social networking sites and other general websites.  There is very little wading through material and its clearly presented.  On one level its a grea research nd networking tool.  However while its useful to be well connected online the volume of personal information produced by just searching by name is alarming.  Most PR peoples full contact details are included on the end of press releases that are posted on client company’s website or SEO PR sites so no more hiding now!

Posting presentations on your blog

In the interest of sharing and hopefully shortening the learning curve for someone else here are the instructions for posting presentations onto your blog.

 

1. Register with SlideShare.  The site appears unaccessible a good bit so try again later if it fails.

2. Once registered upload your slide deck.  This failed a couple of times with me but you shoud be able to see the status under my-slideshow.

3. Once its uploaded, look to the right hand side of the screen where you will see some code for wordpress. 

4. Copy and paste this into your blog entry and hey presto (hopefully) the slide deck appears similar to YouTube videos.