<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social media &#8211; hot or not in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eoinkennedy.ie/blog/2009/03/social-media-hot-or-not-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eoinkennedy.ie/blog/2009/03/social-media-hot-or-not-in-2009/</link>
	<description>A Public Relations Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://eoinkennedy.ie/blog/2009/03/social-media-hot-or-not-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3828</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eoinkennedy.ie/blog/?p=98#comment-3828</guid>
		<description>Thanks Thomas.  Wish I could claim credit for HB but it was not I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Thomas.  Wish I could claim credit for HB but it was not I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Brunkard</title>
		<link>http://eoinkennedy.ie/blog/2009/03/social-media-hot-or-not-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Brunkard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eoinkennedy.ie/blog/?p=98#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>I suspect that over zealous and insensitive marketeers high on the fumes of the smouldering wreck that is print advertising will spam its potential into the middle of next week.  As with previous precedent in communications history, this gives an excellent opportunity for the more sensitive PR practitioner to get in.  I can see it happen already with Irish attempts to rebrand advertising as social media strategy.

I very much enjoyed your HB campaign.  It has the right idea at appealing to why people indulge in social networking online in the first instance.

Regards the 28% figure on OPR, I think they consider emailing journalists and spamming bloggers is OPR...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that over zealous and insensitive marketeers high on the fumes of the smouldering wreck that is print advertising will spam its potential into the middle of next week.  As with previous precedent in communications history, this gives an excellent opportunity for the more sensitive PR practitioner to get in.  I can see it happen already with Irish attempts to rebrand advertising as social media strategy.</p>
<p>I very much enjoyed your HB campaign.  It has the right idea at appealing to why people indulge in social networking online in the first instance.</p>
<p>Regards the 28% figure on OPR, I think they consider emailing journalists and spamming bloggers is OPR&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

